Houm_WA
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2006
- Posts
- 3,948
- Reaction score
- 261
Mike, my notion is that the height sensors and auto-leveling will accomodate some sag in the strut. If the sag gets to be such that it takes a sensor out-of-calibration, you'd get a fault. There are also cross-articulation faults for when the calibration is out of whack.
I can't really say for sure how each of these trace though. My shock failed somewhat unexpectedly, but until then the suspension was performing perfectly fine, which is why I think the EAS can accomodate some wear of the strut. Now that I've thought it through, I am going to stay more on top of monitoring the strut so that if I see interference between the shock and the UCA, I'll know it's time to replace.
I've replaced just one...and it seems to perform just fine. Now, maybe you are correct in that replacing all 4 would be better, but that's about $3500 to have "better" instead of "good."
I can't really say for sure how each of these trace though. My shock failed somewhat unexpectedly, but until then the suspension was performing perfectly fine, which is why I think the EAS can accomodate some wear of the strut. Now that I've thought it through, I am going to stay more on top of monitoring the strut so that if I see interference between the shock and the UCA, I'll know it's time to replace.
I've replaced just one...and it seems to perform just fine. Now, maybe you are correct in that replacing all 4 would be better, but that's about $3500 to have "better" instead of "good."