I am looking to buy an 09 lr3 or 10-11 lr4 if the price is right. With Land rover's well documented reliability problems, wouldn't buying a used car with high miles mean the owner trusted it to go the distance and wasn't hit left and right with small issues? Whereas a LR with low miles may be more appealing, but the owner may have simply be frustrated with it and gotten rid of it quickly.
Perhaps an 09 with low miles would be worse to own than an 11 with high miles at the same price. Or does the high mileage deter you because that may lead to a different set of repair problems?
To my thinking, your logic makes perfect sense for a MY2013 to MY2014 and 40K vs 10K miles, but for 09-11 mileage is going to be at least 60K, so long ago the initial bugs/lemons were filtered out. Around 100K+/- you get to start thinking about larger issues (tranny, differentials, etc). That said, there are a lot of happy owners on this forum (myself included, 2011 LR4 HSE-Lux). When I was on the fence, an acquaintance with a 2006 LR3 convinced me. As long as you have a certain sense of humor for minor bugs, and budget to occasionally fix major things, with just a bit of luck you will love your Rover.
A few bugs are factored into the resale prices - budget accordingly. Meanwhile, look forward to driving an amazing vehicle, and carry a good tow strap for pulling out various lessor vehicles buried up to their axles from time-to-time.
