That's what I was thinking, although there might be some copyright issues.
The standard (dare I say rule of thumb?) is whether the proposed scheme can be reasonably confused with the existing scheme, such that the existing scheme could be harmed in a business sense.
I know what you're thinking -- how do some stickers from a non-profit website harm LR's business? Well, it's simple: Every LRWO sticker bought is one LRSV sticker not bought. At least, that's what LRNA could claim.
That all said, it'd be difficult for LRNA to do much more than get injunctive relief, i.e., a court order to cease production and sale of the stickers. If all the stickers Sam had made were already sold, there's not much of a remedy.
SO: I vote for Tom's logo7.gif (with the .org) first, with the LRWO/LRSV sticker second.
Andy
PS: I am not acting as a lawyer on behalf of LRWO or Sam. This is just my opinion. Etc., Etc., Etc.
