Brakes

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

CMGRover

Full Access Member
Joined
May 1, 2010
Posts
834
Reaction score
3
Brake pad wear sensor light came on the other day. Guess it's that time. Got a few questions though-

1. I think it is the fronts and my reasoning is that they are maybe a year older than the rear and the fronts usually wear quicker anyway. Is that safe to assume? The front ones have about 40-50k on them.
2. The dash light is my only warning- I have no vibrations, squeaking or other noises associated with worn brakes. Given that, could I do just the pads/wear sensor and leave the rotors alone?
 

roverman

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2007
Posts
1,667
Reaction score
109
First, on rovers for whatever reason, the backs go faster. That's not to say it isn't the fronts since they are older. If the sensors are working right, putting on a new sensor only, would just blow the sensor again. You could just bypass the sensor and get a few more miles probably, but why bother? Pads are cheap.

Edit, sorry read it wrong. How many miles on your discs?
 

CMGRover

Full Access Member
Joined
May 1, 2010
Posts
834
Reaction score
3
Same as the pads, if I had to guess the front ones are between 40k and 50k, the rear ones are about 15k newer than the front!

I'm assuming the sensors are working...I mean it seems like it is due just looking at the time line.
 

Disco Mike

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Posts
1,949
Reaction score
4
Bewtter yet, you could pull a r/f and r/r wheel and inspect the pads in case the sensor is good. If your pad is not as thick as the backing plate, replace them. Might want to consider using Akebono ceramic pads, they last longer, don't squeak, no brake dust and they last longer.
 

Trynian

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Posts
836
Reaction score
9
First, on rovers for whatever reason, the backs go faster. That's not to say it isn't the fronts since they are older. If the sensors are working right, putting on a new sensor only, would just blow the sensor again. You could just bypass the sensor and get a few more miles probably, but why bother? Pads are cheap.

Edit, sorry read it wrong. How many miles on your discs?

My rears have always lasted longer then the front. I Am at 95k and the fronts have been replaced 3 times and the back only twice.
 

jjvd21

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Posts
577
Reaction score
36
I just changed out with EBC rotors and Akebono pads. Virtually no brake dust compared to stock parts. Not much more expensive either. If you want the info if be happy to post.
 

CMGRover

Full Access Member
Joined
May 1, 2010
Posts
834
Reaction score
3
Just replaced the fronts today....and the damn light is still on. Disconnected the battery (+ terminal)for 30 mins. :( Any thoughts?
 

jjvd21

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Posts
577
Reaction score
36
Pretty sure the sensors are not reusable once they've been triggered.
 

CMGRover

Full Access Member
Joined
May 1, 2010
Posts
834
Reaction score
3
I mean I replaced the rotors, pads and a new sensor. So it's a new sensor.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
36,702
Posts
222,594
Members
30,876
Latest member
Ejp1989
Top