Then once again, where is the smoking gun.
What you are claiming is just not happening and in the case of those using my gear with an Optima for their auxiliary battery, are actually get the reverse happening.
Quite a large number of D3, D4 and RRS owners have reported that while they have been able to start their vehicles ( in most cases ) they had been getting low battery indications on numerous occasions prior to installing one of me dual battery systems.
With just one exception, everyone who has fitted my system and an Optima battery has found the error message is no longer appearing.
Furthermore, while I would not be surprised if many of these vehicles have battery capacities down to only 80% SoC while running around town, this has little to do with any form of permanent loss of battery capacity but is nothing more than a lack of charging time and is something I have regularly referred to as the Shopping Trolley Syndrome.
Shopping Trolley Syndrome is a common situation where a given vehicle is only driven for a short time, each time the motor is started.
This Shopping Trolley Syndrome is the prime cause for the low battery indication, but once my system is installed and because of the way it works, what happens is just before the vehicle is stared both batteries will be at about the same SoC.
The motor is then started and the vehicle is driven for a short time and the motor is then stopped but the drive time is not long enough for the cranking battery to be fully charged.
Now this is where you theory is not supported. The Optima, because of it’s ability to take high inrush currents, will charge quicker than the cranking battery and will be at a higher SoC when the motor is stopped.
The Optima will then slowly discharge into the cranking battery.
While this does not raise the cranking battery’s SoC by much at all, it is sufficient to keep the cranking battery at a higher state of charge even in Shopping Trolley Syndrome situations and and is a case where having two batteries wired in parallel is preventing a discharge and is the exact reverse of what you are claiming.
This still does not cover the available amount of power one needs and uses while camping or on trips, and the Shopping Trolley Syndrome does not apply here because in the vast majority of cases, someone going away for a weekend or on vacation, will be driving for many hours and this long drive time is where all the batteries in a vehicle will easily reach at least 90+% SoC, with most reaching above 95%, and all this capacity is then available.
Now if your theory was the case, then not only would the auxiliary battery be in a low state, as you theorised, at 20% less capacity, but because of the way my isolators work, the auxiliary battery would draw down the cranking battery and it would also be 20% worse off. This is just not the case.
Now with more than 5 years of set ups being installed and used in D3s, your theory would have shown up by now if it was fact, and people would notice something was wrong because they would be getting very short operating times before they needed to recharge their batteries.
The reality is that most people with my system installed, not only get better operating times between charges while off camping, they also tend to get longer life spans from their cranking batteries.
Again, none of this would be happening if your theory was fact, I reiterate, where is your smoking gun?