I'd say that the Wrangler and Land Rover share a similar level of reliability.
The LR4 can accommodate 7 passengers, which is a mandatory feature for many of us LR4 owners.
The LR4 has a nicer ride than the Jeep.
The LR4 is much more luxurious than the Jeep.
The LR4 is much better looking than the Jeep.
If I were picking a vehicle for the sake of adventure, I'd pick the Jeep without question. Before you all accuse me of blasphemy, let me explain.
First, the Jeep costs half as much as the LR4, so if you scratch or dent it, you'll care half as much.
The Jeep has a removable top, which is fun.

The Jeep has solid axles. I can lift the truck/modify the suspension to my heart's content. I can make a Jeep that will go places that no LR4 will ever see. Without coming close to the LR4 price tag.
I can put real off-road tires on a Jeep and actually air them down.
The Jeep has hundreds of aftermarket accessories available. Winch bumpers, cargo racks galore, all sorts of undercarriage armor. Dana axles, locking differentials front and rear. Light bars, off-road lighting of any flavor. It's pretty capable out of the showroom, but I can tailor the capability to my needs. With a Jeep, you just have more choice.
The Jeep is much simpler than the LR4. You've all heard me drone on about this before. Complexity is the enemy of reliability. The Jeep can be made into an expedition vehicle. The LR4 can't. Too much wire. Too many gizmos. Too much software. Independent suspension. Air springs. Driving "modes". It's the antithesis of the K.I.S.S. principle. For ski resorts and fire roads the LR4 is superb. But to really go somewhere off the beaten path, and get back again, it's got to be the Jeep.
So my advice to anthonysmith101 is to enjoy the hell out of that Jeep. Land Rover's not going anywhere. Do all the things in the Jeep that you won't be able to do with an LR4. Meanwhile, pine away for the luxury, ride, and sophistication of the LR4, and in a few years trade the Jeep in on Land Rover's current most appealing offering.