I was thinking about this situation that many think a thicker oil would be better, as I was looking at the 5w-20 option from Castrol for high mileage vehicles.
It has me thinking (a dangerous and rare thing).
As some claim that the only reason manufacturers have gone to thinner oils is for fuel economy AND fuel economy is driven be efficiencies, does it not follow that there is less friction in the engine, therefore less engine wear by keeping to these lighter weight oils?
Also, a majority of engine wear occurs at startup and at idle. In one case, oil starvation. The latter, when oil pressure is low…. another case of starvation? What’s interesting is that at idle, rpms are low; thus many would wrongly assume engine wear at low rpm is minimal.
The obvious, engines today are made to much finer tolerances than the engines of yesterday seems to be missed by some. finer tolerances = much smaller gaps.
So, I’m going to keep to what the engineers suggest for their product until the utopia of snake oil becomes approved.