No offense to above but anyone with a rover under 100k basically doesn't know either way outside of uncommon issues. Ask a mechanic who's been working on rovers since at least 2007. Three I've talked to all said the lr3 engine is clearly more reliable in terms of expensive issues to deal with - like mentioned above.
Now, if I could get a better transmission into the lr3 i'd be happy as hell

those of us with a lot of crap on board know how it's hard for it to hold 6th gear on the slightest grades. It's not a practical problem but it is just kind of annoying especially since at one time I also had a VW V10 tdi Touareg which had so much torque it wouldn't need to shift unless you really tried to push it.
My lr3 feels peppier now with the Magnaflow full exhaust system and rides better than new with all the suspension bushings and struts replaced so that makes up for spending 10' of $k's on an lr4. I'll be buying a Kimberly instead...
It's all about perspective and priorities though so I could totally understand someone 'wanting' a newer peppier feeling LR4.